Guy's theory - Gaia Theory. Gay - Live Land What's Planet Gay

The assumptions about the land as a holistic living system began to occur in scientific circles in the 18th-XIX century. But more or less clear contours of this concept has acquired only in the 70s of the last centuries. The British Chemist James Lavlock became its developer, and the doctrine itself gained the name of the Gay Theory.

J. Loughlock is not just a chemist, but also a practitioner, researcher and inventor. For some time he worked in the United States under the Space Agency (NASA). He created and patented a number of devices, mainly on the study of processes in the atmosphere. A number of its theoretical assumptions over time were confirmed in practice. For example, one time it was believed that the sulfur washed into the ocean returns from the ocean into the atmosphere and on land in the form of hydrogen sulfide. J. Lavlock suggested that this is not the case, and in 1971 organized studies in which it proved that the refund occurs due to another compound - dimethyl sulfide. In short, the authority of J. Lavlock as a scientist, few people question.

A good name for creative research is half a success. A similar approach, perhaps played a significant role in popularizing this theory. J. Lavlock listened to the advice of the writer L. Golding and named his teaching in honor of the ancient Greek Goddess of the Earth - Gay. Although the author himself recognizes that in an emotional, or even religious context, Gaya is more associated with the image of the Virgin. The theory of gay is a greater extent of the hypothesis, because it is not possible to fully prove it, as well as disprove it, it is impossible due to the extreme complexity of the very phenomenon of life on the planet.

Based on the theory of gay, the planet Earth is a holistic organism. All living creatures on the planet are closely connected not only among themselves, but also with objects of inanimate nature, as a result of which the self-developing, inefficient and self-regulating system is formed, which in its properties resembles the physiological system of the living organism. Various planet ecosystems seem to be organs of this huge body, and the structure itself has a clear hierarchy: cells - organisms - organisms - ecosystems - biosphere, which simultaneously penetrate into the air, water, soil. But since the bulk of this body is still inorganic substances, the image of this mouth is similar, according to J. Lavlock, with a tree trunk: life on the planet is a very thin layer of green cambium under the crust, and its main weight is non-fat wood which is largely generated by this fine film. The development of such an approach to the interaction of a living and non-living thing led to the emergence of a new direction in science - geophysiology. The aggregate of living organisms, according to the Russian researcher, A. B. Kazan, as it would adjust the global indicators of the environment under themselves. J. Lavlock himself describes this picture: "Thanks to the incessant activity of living organisms, the conditions on the planet are supported in a state-favorable condition over the past 3.6 billion years. Any species that adversely affect the environment make it less suitable for offspring, will eventually be expelled ... "

The high level of geography self-organization determines the possibility of supporting a number of its parameters in a relatively stable state, i.e. self-regulation, which is characteristic of both individual living beings. For example, warm-blooded organisms, including people, are able to maintain a constant temperature of their body, unless of course external temperatures do not exceed critical quantities. But in the event of some internal changes, the same diseases, the temperature of the body can change and grow. Therefore, the temperature of the entire planet is relatively stable, despite the fact that solar activity can change. However, the internal processes on Earth are much more significant factors for changing the same temperature, if something begins to occur not so in the gigantic oversgan.

Gay Theory has some similarity with the teachings of V. I. Vernadsky about the biosphere. However, two of these concepts have fundamental differences. Gay Lovelock is a planet Earth as a whole, and not only a living matter, therefore, in this theory, the question of the spatial boundaries of the nipper is not rising. Secondly, the theory of Lovelock categorically does not accept the thought of controlling the planet from a person, as expressed in the concept of V. I. Vernadsky about the noosphere.

Gay theory has a lot of critics. So, biologist P. Ward notes that many mass extinction on the planet occurred for internal reasons, from which it follows that the ability to reasonable self-regulation is exaggerated at a minimum. According to another biologist R. Dobkinza, "Egoism" the theory of Darwin contradicts the "altruism" of self-regulation of GAI, and therefore the evolution would be impossible. In addition, he notes that since the planet is not able to be reproduced, then there is no natural selection among the planets. In general, many critics are suitable for this theory with strict straightness. On the other hand, some researchers point out the fact that the ideas expressed by J. Lovelock are generally not beyond the framework of traditional geophysics, the important role of living organisms in which few people question. Therefore, nothing fundamentally new, in their opinion, there is no gay theory.

J. Lavlock himself and his colleague Biologist L. Margulis recently increasingly insist on the fact that the theory of gay is not a purely scientific nature. Gai as superorganism is not a direct fact, but a metaphor. Yes, and the device of life processes on the planet is so complicated that a traditional scientific analysis is unlikely to ever be able to give a clear answer to the question, what is Gaa. This is worth adding the fact that the philosophers-existentialists in the twentieth century worked well and now the accuracy of the scientific analysis itself largely can be questioned. Therefore, the doctrine of hea is rather philosophical than strictly scientific. J. Lavlock continues to call his teaching by the hypothesis and the "way of life of agnostics", i.e. Those who do not believe in the possibility of the absolute knowledge of the world. At the same time, the image of GII, as the Goddess of the Earth, gave this teaching emotional, one can say aesthetic color, which many environmentally eco-indifferent people picked up. But it is impossible not to mention the fact that individual dubious personalities are often speculating on such hypotheses, issuing the desired for valid. Therefore, the initial theory of GII should be distinguished from various kinds of mystical, mythological, esoteric and other dubious layers.

Geophysiology provides for the concept of planetary medicine. The author himself considers the most dangerous for health of the GAI inventions of humanity, a car and animal husbandry. It is these phenomena that determine the "disease" of gays. Based on the theory of gay, anxiety is only about a person, as a particular biological form, with the help of technical achievements and with simultaneous deterioration in the habitat for other species, it will be too early or later to return boomerang and to a person. Momoving itself to God and the liberated fruits of scientific and technological progress, a person begins to fight gay, forgetting that he is just one of its components. Therefore, a person is waiting for an inevitable defeat, since it is a struggle against himself.

The age of the solar system and the gay hypothesis. Most people know the unique characteristics of the Earth, which make a possible life on our planet. Such characteristics include the chemical composition of the planet and its atmosphere, the slope of the earth's axis, the connection with the moon, the trajectory of the Earth orbits and the distance to the Sun. It is known that the Sun manages the thermonuclear reaction - the source of energy is sufficient for the sun to shine very and very long. Calculations show that it is enough to maintain the current brightness of the Sun for about ten billion years. It is believed that most stars also control similar nuclear reactions. This state of affairs is the name of the main sequence - the period of stability, which corresponds to most of the long life of the star. Suppose that the sun was the star of the main sequence since the formation, that is, about 4.6 billion years ago. This period is almost half of the alleged life of the Sun; Thus, the sun at the moment spent about half of its stock of energy. And this means that about half of the hydrogen in his kernel was changed with helium. Change of chemical composition leads to a change in the structure of the kernel. The overall structure of the Sun should also change, so that today the sun should shine approximately 40% brighter than 4.6 billion years ago. It would inevitably affect the temperature of the planets. It is believed that even the smallest deviations in the brightness of the Sun will entail the tragic consequences for the earth's climate. 40% The change in the brightness of the Sun, thus, would lead to the change of climate, comparable along the scale with the current differences between the Venus, Mars and the Earth. According to the theory of evolution, about four billion years ago, when, as it is believed, life on Earth has just originated, the planet's temperature was close to the present. But, in this case, the subsequent increase in the brightness of the Sun was to lead to such a heat, in which life on Earth would be impossible. It can be naive to assume that initially on Earth was much more cool, and over time heated. But this is unreal. Geologists note that, according to the study of rocks, the average land temperature over the past four billion years has not changed too much; Biologists argue that for the development and evolution of life, approximately a permanent average temperature is necessary. This problem is called a "young weak sun" paradox. The inappropriateness of such a process prompted Lovelock to push gay hypothesis. According to it, the biosphere (consisting of earthly oceans, atmospheric, bark and all living beings) is a kind of superboriganism, which turned out during evolution. The atmosphere has changed to protect the developing life from the threat of the increasing brightness of the sun. The hypothesis of Lovelock did not conquer universal recognition, mainly due to the fact that it is based on the spiritual principle. In fact, it does not lead to a mystical look at the world. The physical principles on which the paradox of a young weak sun, firm and unshakable, so astronomers are confident in the reality of this effect. Consequently, evolutionists are facing the choice of one of the two possible explanations of how almost a constant temperature was established on Earth instead of a steadily increasing inflow of energy. One of these explanations invites us to believe that by random changes, the atmosphere has evolved so as to resist heating. At best, this means that the atmosphere passed through a number of states of unstable equilibrium or even non-equilibrium. Something similar happens with alive organisms under the influence of complex regulation systems encoded in DNA. Death is a process in which complex biochemical reactions ceases, and cells quickly reach chemical equilibrium. For the atmosphere, a similar process is unthinkable - if we exclude the participation of a reasonable plan. Any type of symbiosis or feedback with the sun is completely excluded. The second explanation suggests that some vital forces conducted an atmosphere by an evolutionary way through this test. Most scientists cannot and threaten to express out loud teleological or spiritual conclusions that may follow from here; However, in physics there is a corresponding direction. Of course, there is a third way. Perhaps the Earth-Sun system is not at all billions years, and there was no 40% increase in solar brightness. If the earth was created recently, if a reasonable idea created her atmosphere, what it is now, if the brightness of the sun has not changed significantly, the paradox of a young weak sun can be considered permitted. Although this paradox does not indicate that the solar system is only a few thousand years old, it seems that it is much less than tens of millions of centuries. The wonders of symbiosis in one of his "biologist-observer" professor Lewis Thomas, the largest American biologist and popularizer of science, talks about a striking microscopic being, which is a support of a large and complex organized world. This world is an Australian solid, the abdication of that special detachment of insects, which build huge in the rainforests, up to fifteen meters high, cone-shaped nests. They build them out of wood, which is greedy devouring, destroying the surrounding forest. More precisely, wood is only the source material for construction; Somewhere in the digestive tract of a small termite, the eaten cellulose turns into the hydrocarbons necessary for the life activity of the termite, and the waste is converted into tiny, geometrically correct and strikingly solid lignin tochens, of which, in fact, the infinite walls, arches and arches of the intricate labyrinth of the firmware are applied. This construction activity of termites seems amazing already in itself and cannot but cause admiration. Looking at a huge melt cone, it is almost impossible to convince himself that all it is erected from tiny lepthechnos, swept out of millions of microscopic ventricles, which are continuously, day after day, not knowing tired, processed cellulose into lignin. It is also difficult, perhaps, looking at some New York skyscraper, convince yourself that it is built from individual modules, this giant seems so solid and huge, the word melted all entirely and immediately. But let's try to look even further into this slightly organized world of small beings. Imagine a separate termit - insect of a few millimeters; then mentally increase it so that it becomes visible to its microscopic digestive tract; I will increase in the imagination and it, and then become a look. We will see dozens and hundreds of even more tiny creatures that live in these bowels and something energetically and cotton-employed. Approach mentally one of them and also increase to see in all details. In biology, the creature is called mixture. It is so well studied that you can tell a pretty much about him. At first glance, it seems to be the usual protozoa (single-cell) organism, which is characterized by very fast and purposeful movements from place to place. The speed of this zigzag movement of the mixture in the depths of the digestive path of the termit makes it a similar water spider, rapidly sliding along the surface of the water. Looking around, it is possible, however, to see that the mixture rushes not anything anywhere, but only in those places where the pieces are floating with a swallowed termit of wood. It turns out that, actually, this is an active creature. It turns out that these tree pieces swallowed, already overwhelmed and thoroughly fierced by the jaws of termit. And today it is already known to biologists that it swallows them so that somewhere in their depths add to them those enzymes that actually decompose the wood pulp on the absorbance of hydrocarbons and the termit termit of Lignin. In other words, not the thermite itself, and dozens and hundreds of these microscopic beings living in his digestive tract are carried out by the most complicated biochemical process, which underlies the entire thermal life and the entire thermal community. Without these tiny mixtures, there would be no huge fracther with its walls, arches and arches, no those "mushroom farms", which cultivate termites in the forest, nor the processing of rotten wood of this forest into fertile humus, which are busy growing on "farms" mushrooms, Neither ultimately the termites themselves. Therefore, the initial statement of our story was extremely substantiated: mixtures are indeed the support of all this large and difficult to organized thermal world. However, the most striking is still ahead. Mentally approaching his eyes one of the microscopic mixtures and slightly increasing it, we will find it (in reality it can be seen only with the help of an electron microscope) that those elegant cilia that protrude from her sides, like oars on some gallery, and so Surprisingly consistently, in the beat, rise and go down, giving a mixture of its rapid movement in the digestive path of termit, in fact, are not at all her cilias, but completely separate creatures of even smaller sizes; These creatures are more precisely, cells belong to the family of so-called spirochete, that is, microorganisms having the shape of winding rolling flavors. Pathogenic types of spirochet cause syphilis, returning title and some other diseases, but in this case we are quite harmless representatives of this family, and their entire life goal is only to join the huge (for them) mixture and take advantage of the tiny portion of those nutrients Hydrocarbons it produces with the help of their enzymes. In turn, these spirochetes, in perfectly equal intervals covering the entire surface of the mixture, as we have seen, help her move in search of still undequired wood. But it is not all. Carefully leaving the whole field of this cycling, tireless activities going in the digestive tract of termit, we will see the other participants. There are some oval calves near the surface of the mixture on the surface of the mixture, and many of the flames themselves are styled by the same form of the microenmium of the same tiny - in comparison, even with mixture sizes. All this is bacteria that are also living in symbiosis, that is, in mutual cooperation with mixture and spirochetes and supplying part of those enzymes that are needed to process cellulose in hydrocarbons and lignin to the overall boiler. Lewis Thomas completes his story with the words: "The whole symbiotic ecosystem that stuck in a dead end of the evolutionary path is a visual model of how our cells occurred." Then he mentions the name Lynn Margulis, and from this place I can already pick up the thread of the story and continue it in the conceived direction. Some colleagues consider Lynn Margulis one of the largest biologists of our century. Others with this categorically disagree and consider it a fanatics of dubious ideas, proclaimed with annoying arrogance and contempt for opponents. Lynn Margulis itself, now Professor of the Biology of Amherst University, talks about himself and its ideas as follows: "I am engaged in an evolutionary biology, but the object of my research is unicellular and microorganisms. Biologists such as Richard Doubt, John Maynard Smith, George Williams, Stephen Jay Gould and many others, belong to zoologists, animal researchers, which, in my opinion, means that they are studying the problem that has lost their relevance of about three billion years ago . They are engaged in organisms that arose on Earth some 500 million years ago. It is about the same thing as learning the history of mankind since 1800. After all, life on our planet has been there almost four billion years! Up until the sixties of our century, all researchers systematically ignored this fundamental fact of evolution for the simple reason that due to their ignorance could not explain it. Based on countless observations and experiments, it is known that evolution is based on a natural selection chosen from all varieties of this body that as a result of mutations acquired some contributing properties. It is not known only where these beneficial properties come from. This question has not yet had a fairly clear answer. I argue that we are committed to the most important properties with the relationship between organisms, that the Russian researcher Konstantin Meryezhkovsky once called "symbiogenesis". Under symbogenesis, I understand the inclusion of genetic material of microorganisms into hereditary cells of plants or animals. The resulting new genetic systems - hybrids of bacterial and vegetable, or bacterial and animal cells - are something truly new, fundamentally different from the source cells that have not contained symbiont materials. Of these "chimer", more and more complex biological systems are gradually developing. I do not believe that such new systems, new biological species may arise on the basis of only random mutations. " Symbiosis, referring to Lynn Margulis, is the physical association of various organisms, their joint accommodation in the same space and time. But true symbiosis has nothing to do with its banal understanding of both "cooperation", based on one of the balance sheet and costs. You can not like a biological symbiosis with a simple mutually beneficial cooperation of people or companies. Such an "economic" approach is suitable only for explaining and understanding modern symbiotic systems, which, as a rule, represent a system of several mechanically organisms that are stuck in halfway evolution and no longer developing further. True Symbiosis, says Lynn Margulis, is that as a result of long-term coexistence, he always led to the organic "merger" of heterogeneous organisms into a new whole whole and in this sense was always, according to Margulis, the main factor in the evolutionary update. This look at the symbiosis may seem - and many biologists do seem to be extreme. Margulis itself came to him on the basis of several biological facts. Margulis drew attention to the fact that the simplest body of Aurelia Parametion exists the so-called "killer" generation, the transfer of which by inheritance occurs according to other rules than the transfer of chromosomal genes. It turned out that this gene is not contained in the parametion cell core, but in its cytoplasm surrounding this core. The simplests already found quite a few such cytoplasma genes. Not so long ago, two American researchers, David Lac and John Hall, said they found them even in the cells of rather complex algae. All these facts prompted some scientists to push out cautious guesses, according to which these extraordinary genes are residual genetic material of some viruses or bacteria, accidentally hit the cage and "stuck" in it. Margulis dropped all caution and put forward a radically bold hypothesis, arguing that all such "genes" are actually part of individual (and very ancient) living organisms, to this day living inside cells of higher complexity in symbiotic coexistence with them. In 1966, she wrote an article in which these ideas set forth. It claimed that complex cells arose from simplerly simple symbiosis and combining their substance and genetic material, that is, by symbiogenesis. The article was rejected by fifteen scientific journals as "not suitable for publication" before it adopted the "Journal of Theoretical Biology". Margulis received 800 (!) Inquiries from specialist-biologists who are interested in its ideas, but at the Faculty of Biology of the University of Boston, where she was then listed as an assistant, her success would be perceived very nervously. Ten years later, when she has accumulated so much new material that the article went into the book, she suggested a manuscript to the Academician Press publishing house and faced another refusal. It took another four years before the book (the "origin of eukaryotic cells") decided to publish in the publishing house of Yale University. In subsequent years, she endured three more publications and today is considered to be classic text. Thirty years old passed, but synbiogenesis hypothesis, extended and developed Lynn Margulis, received if not universal, then in any case, very wide recognition. The discoveries confirming the theory of GII mainly this happened thanks to the new discoveries that confirmed its right point. First of all, it should be noted here to mention the studies of the so-called chloroplasts in plant cells and mitochondria - in animal cells. These extrachromosomic genes are also transmitted from the cell to its descendants by special rules, which are largely different from the rules for the transfer of nuclear, or chromosomal genes. Thus, mitochondrial genes in complex organisms (for example, a person) are transmitted only on the maternal line. (And that is why the general ancestor of modern people, discovered due to the similarity of their mitochondrial genes, was called "Mitochondrial Eva.") The main feature of these two organelles, except for their own genes, is that they are doing the most important cells for vital cells. Functions. Chloroplasts with their chlorophyll produce the process of photosynthesis, so characteristic of plant cells and supplying them with organic materials for growth. Mitochondria, having an ATP-synthesis enzyme enzymes in their membranes, carry out the process of creating ATP molecules, which are chemical energy batteries for the cell as a whole, allowing it, in particular, to move in search of food is much more vigorous than the simplest mitochondria is capable of moving. These features convincingly suggest that eukaryotic cells in general have at least two genetic pedigrees, they begin at least from two parents. Billions of years ago, these organelles were separate alive simple organisms. Then at some stage of the evolution, they joined their fate with the fate of some other the same simplest cells, having entered into close symbiosis, and as a result of millipuses of such symbiosis formed the current eukaryotes together with them. It is possible that even the main distinctive characteristic of these eukaryotov - the presence of a cell kernel with its membrane separating this core from the surrounding cytoplasm with its organelles - also arose due to symbiosis or due to it: the appearance of the membrane could be an evolutionary step intended to protect the "their" Genetic material from "Simbiont" genes. "Almost a billion years in a row," Margulis writes, the only existing forms of life have been so-called prokaryotes - the simplest single-celled organisms, such as bacteria and blue-green algae, devoid of kernels. They are today are dominant forms of life on our planet - because their monstrously much. However, by themselves, they are taken separately, they are not very interesting and not very complex. All this first billion years they have existed unchanged. Genuine evolution began with the emergence of eukaryot. And this decisive step of evolution was caused by the symbiosis of prokaryotov of various types. " Today, thanks to the work of Margulis, we know enough how it happened. Remarkable proof of the loyalty of all these ideas is the recent structure of the chloroplastic membrane in one of the types of plant cells: this membrane was not a two-layer, as all conventional cell membranes, and the four-layer, as expected for a two-layer membrane of the former bacteria shrouded the two-layer membrane of the cell, The once "swallowed" this bacterium. Today it is already difficult to reproduce the first stages of this symbiotic evolution, but they undoubtedly were fulfilled by the present drama. Some bacteria invaded the cytoplasm of others, carrying devastation, illness and often the death of host cells. The coexistence of the victim and the aggressor resembled at first, rather the struggle is not for life, but to death. Only those few organisms who, by a happy chance, survived during this war, managed to give the beginning to true symbiontes - hybrid cells, inside which now peacefully coexisted side by side of the former enemies. Symbiogenesis, thus, at first its stages, she looked more like an invasion of foreign pathogens. He was such an invasion, only with an ultra-indulgered outcome. Some biologists are convinced that in the cells of our body there are ancient viruses, accumulating there from the storms and the peripetia of the previous struggle with these cells. Maybe the genetic material of such viruses has become part of our DNA. Maybe the striking ability of the so-called retroviruses (like a virus of AIDS) to embed their genes into our DNA - this is the rest of the once existing and disturbed symbiosis. "Negative Symbiosis" with pathogens knows and not such wonders. Since the beginning of the nineties, when the technique of microscopy of the processes of cell interaction has become developed with the microbes and bacteria, many parts of these processes became in humilies, and these details have forced specialists to conclude that "Two are required for the tango", or how to formulate This is in the professional language Dr. Julia Theorio from the Institute of Biomedical Research in Cambridge, "in almost all cases of such an infectious invasion of the damage caused to them by the body itself, is also the" fault "of the organism itself: the damage causes not only the pathogen itself, but also provoked They have an erroneous cell reaction for its invasion. " Today you can distinguish between a few levels of such "involuntary", if you like symbiotic, "help", which the cell has an aggressor. At the simplest level, this demonstrate, for example, staphylococci. Some of their species are allocated under the substance useful for the cell, and it "swings" their receptors in front of them. In more sophisticated cases, such "negative symbiosis" on the receptors "sitting" by the pathogen itself - this is done by cholera vibrine, using this convenient position to highlight its toxins into the cell. In even more insidious cases of "cooperation", genuine miracles of symbiosis occur. The simplest intestinal wand, the escherichia, causing the already mentioned diarrhea (sometimes even deadly), demonstrates one of these miracles. At first she deceives the intestinal cell to reset the outer hair, so that the bacteria would be easier to grasp her surface. And after that, she provokes the same unfortunate creating to give it to the membrane, a kind of "pedestal", being in which bacterium is inaccessible for cellular means of protection. However, the highest degree of intimate proximity is demonstrated, of course, those pathogens that penetrate the inside of the cell. It turns out that it knows not only the notorious AIDS virus. Such ability is made by many conventional pathogens. They implement it by sending a special chemical signal about their presence, which plays the role of a peculiar Trojan horse - in response to this signal, the cell protrudes its membrane towards the approaching bacteria, envelops it and pulls into itself. Once inside the cell, the bacterium immediately secretes its enzymes, which are shifted by the cell membrane and allow bacteria to enter the cytoplasm, where it often becomes a permanent "guest", forming a protective vacuole. In many cases, such bacteria use this vacuole as a means of transition to a new phase of infection. They begin to directly cross the cell into a cage, thus the protective systems of the body. Perhaps those distant initial stages of ancient symbiogenesis, which ultimately led to the emergence of first eukaryotes, also looked in the exhausting battles in which the symbionti opponents resorted to such a sophisticated military tricks, infinitely changing their strategy and using the involuntary services of each other. Who knows ... You can only say that invisible miracles of symbiosis, both fruitful and negative, truly surround us from all sides and make up one of the indispensable foundations of life - and perhaps some kind of universal essence. As the same Lewis Thomas said, with whose story about Mixtrikha I began this article, "may have understood this essence, this underlying life tend to unite and cooperate cells, which ultimately spawned roses, dolphins and ourselves, we would understand that the same trend encourages the organisms to unite into groups, the teams of organisms - into environmental systems, and all these systems are in a single biosphere. And then all our protective immune responses and reflex responses to the aggression of "Alien" would be only means of adjusting and modulating this great and universal process of symbiosis intended not for its complete termination, but only so that it does not come out of control " . Developing this point of view, we sooner or later come to the majestic picture of the biosphere, which once inspired Vernadsky, and today he cultulined in the so-called gay hypothesis developed by James Lovelock, who claims that symbiosis (understood in the broadest sense - as self-organization based on Cooperatives and interaction) exists not only at the level of bodily cells and bacteria, but also at the level of such complex systems, as an atmosphere, soil, and even our land as a whole. GEA's hypothesis says that even such planetary parameters, such as the temperature and chemical composition of the atmosphere, are the result of joint activities of all living organisms of the planet. Lavlock, in essence, argues that the whole earth is a single enormous organism. More precisely, it would be called it a single ecological system, which consists of a huge number of symbiotically interacting smaller ecosystems and thanks to which it is capable of "healing" their wounds, and regulate their deviations from equilibrium. The ancient Greeks called the gaga goddess of the Earth. Gay's hypothesis, whether it is true, would be the highest, the limit miracle of symbiosis - except for the American astronomer Leo Smolin to recognize the "living" the whole universe. This hypothesis is discussed very widely, but is accepted very few. Lewis Thomas and Lynn Margulis belong to this inspired grand vision of a minority. References Vernadsky V.I. "Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon", M. - 1989. Vernadsky V.I. "The beginning and eternity of life", M.- 1989. 1. Life and the Earth make up a single superhorn http://kokshetau.online.kz/ ot / black.htm Four measurements of deep ecology. http://baltchild.org.ru/rus/mater/ dpecol.htm.

Gay - Living Earth

Our planetary house, blue planet Earth floating in the dark space of space, is it alive or not? Possible answers: "Of course, yes!", "Of course not!" And also: "Partially live, partially - no." All of them have the right to exist, but before choosing the right answer, let's think: what do we know about our planet? We know her inner structure - core, mantle, boron and external shells (lithospheric, hydrosphere and atmosphere). We also know that the earth has one natural satellite and that, thanks to the forces of gravity, she draws around the sun. But most importantly, there are conditions for the existence of life: water and atmosphere with the desired oxygen content and a protective ozone layer. And therefore plants grow on Earth, animals walk, birds fly, swim fish, and all together it is permeated by the myriads of omnipresent microorganisms and bacteria that live almost everywhere.

Different sciences help us to study our planet: geologic geomorphology, geography and many others geo-. In the names they are present Greek root. The ancient Greeks revered the goddess of land gay (Dr. Greek. ????), Mother of all that lives and grows on it.

Today a new science is developing Geophysiology, the theory of living earth, which began the GEAS hypothesis proposed in the 1970s by the English scientist James Lavlok. Lavlock believes that "the evolution of all biological organisms is so closely associated with the evolution of their physical environment on the scale of the planet, which together they constitute a single self-developing system, which herself regulates itself, resembling the physiological properties of a living organism." The author himself says with regret that when Gay's hypothesis was born, he was not yet familiar with the works of V.I. Vernadsky about the biosphere, and in essence gay and the biosphere are very close.

So, biosphere - live Earth shell, life distribution area, where living and non-living strongly mixed. Is it possible to imagine a bird without air, fish without water, a plant without soil? You can, of course, with the scientific goal of "remove" a living of non-living, such as a bee from the hive. If you even need to feed it and provide all the necessary conditions, then after a few days the bee will die. Beehive is not a faceless "environment", but her native home, dwelling (Greek ?????, hence ecology - Science of the house). Did you survive an animal without home? And man?

In the biosphere, everything is inseparable and interrelated, interacts and complements each other's existence. Imagine, for example, sleeping a live tree. It is alive only a very thin layer of cells - cambiums located around the perimeter, just under the crust. Everything else is the cork layer and the bark (that is, more than 97% of the tree) - dead cells. Also the live sheath of gays, a biosphere, a thin film covers the planet. If you imagine the land in the form of a basketball ball with the oceans and countries drawn on it, then the thickness of the biosphere will be approximately equal to the paint thickness.

According to another modern theory - theory avtoposha (self-willing) of Chilean neurobiologists W. Maturna and Fr. Werelas - Earth is a living self-breathing and self-sensitive system. After all, she "learns" life, reacts to changes, adapting to them and preserving itself. But there is a limit that cannot be opened. Such global processes as climate change, the destruction of the ozone layer, the melting of the Arctic ice and the degradation of coral reefs, obviously suggest that our planet is not healthy.

"Gay made me a planetary physician, and since I perceive my profession seriously, I have to report badly to me," Peclock writes. He believes that humanity can be called the "nervous system" of the Earth, thanks to which Gay is aware of himself, he knows his appearance and place in the universe. But this "nervous system" of GII brings her the most innumerable disasters. On one of the Internet sites you can find such a joke. Two girlfriend planets met in space. One of them complained to another on what feels very badly, as people have a lot. The interlocutor began deeply and remembered that such an unpleasant attack had happened and with her. But she immediately calmed the unfortunate, knowing the personal experience that the disease is not fatal and assured a girlfriend that she will definitely cope with it.

"The entire appearance of the Earth, the climate, the composition of rocks, air and ocean waters is not only the result of geological processes, but also a consequence of the presence of life. Thanks to the incessant activity of living organisms, the conditions on the planet are supported in a favorable state over the past 3.6 billion years. Any species that adversely affect the environment make it less suitable for offspring, will eventually be expelled in the same way as weaker, evolutionally unsuitable species ... "(J. Lavlock).

Back in the 20s of the last century, VI Vernadsky warned about the growing human influence on the evolution of the biosphere, "because Homo sapiens - unprecedented in its scale geochemical force which increases its influence on the development of scientific thought." Anticipating the trends of the human impact on nature, the scientist still dreamed with optimism about the gradual transition of the biosphere into a qualitatively new state - the nosphere, the scope of the mind.

All people are different, and not everyone, like James Lovelok, will be planetary therapists. In antiquity, this term called special people - the human soul healers who serve him with higher virtues and advantages (Dru. Greek. ?????????? "Deminister"). Especially since it is incredibly difficult when it comes to planet, cosmic beings, spatial and temporal horizons of which are much higher than human. But each of us is able to at least not be "diathesis" on the body of the earth, gays - their only and native home.

Olga Korotkov

“Primitive peoples knew that the land was alive!
She has consciousness. They knew that we could talk to her
And she speaks with you. They knew that if you celebrate her
She will celebrate you in response ...
And that you will never take more than they gave.
Earth - essence, vibrating and lively ...”
Crucian

Guy's theory (Gaia Theory.; From Gea, the ancient Greek Goddess of the Earth) is the theory, which is based on a hypothesis about the interaction of live matter with its environment. Our Planet Earth has a "mind" associated with the rest of the "alive" planets.

The author of the biosphere "Theory Guy" British ecologist James Lavlock ( James Ephraim Lovelock, 1919) It claims that the Earth, seeking self-preservation, can destroy humanity, which has a negative impact on nature.

Topics discussed in "Notes of Life":

Also, in addition to the degradation of the upper layers of the Earth shell, the entire planet is destroyed. We significantly affected precipitation (especially in the warm season). For example, spraying silver oxide for abundant rains, distortion of the electromagnetic field of the Earth with an artificial field, etc.

The fact that the land is deliberately changing the climate to extinct people - doubtful ... The fact that humanity will sweep up and without the help of nature, the earth, Guy - Fact ... We are not at all kings of nature, we are unreasonable creatures that destroy the environment of the planet.

P.S. If there were no people - the earth would be a luxurious planet!

Guia theory (Gaia Theory; from Gaya, the ancient Greek Goddess of the Earth) is the theory, which is based on a hypothesis about the interaction of living matter with its environment. Our Planet Earth has a "mind" associated with the rest of the "alive" planets ..
The author of the biosphere "Theory Guy" British ecologist James Lovelock (James Ephraim Lovelock, 1919) argues that the Earth, seeking self-preservation, can destroy humanity that has a negative impact on nature.
The Earth is a single organism, constantly developing and striving for self-preservation, actively responding with hurricanes, tsunami, heat, frosts and other climatic manifestations for the negative effect of a human man.
"We are the goal of Guy, we are actually already in a state of war with it," the thesis of James Lovelock. Humanity should take care of Earth, otherwise the Earth will kill him, sooner or later.

Guy's theory, formulated by Lavalka, the inspiration of "green", back in 1968, today, in connection with the so-called global warming, as never relevant.

Guy's theory today
According to the UN, the number of emergencies associated with the weather (weather anomalies - floods, droughts, typhoon, tornadoes), in the last quarter a century tripled.

These data and progressive warming forced the British Lavlock climatologist to change its pessimistic point of view on the future of the planet for even more insolent.

Professor James Lavlock stated in one of the numbers of ATMOSPHERIC Science Letters magazine, that the climatic processes on the planet passed the so-called "return point", after which the climate return is former, more equilibrium, the state is impossible. And humanity, apparently, is unlikely to be able to survive the era of global change.

"Billions will die before the end of the century," belongs. - I will perish. Only a small toliary of people may be surviving in the Arctic, where, just, the climate will remain relatively tolerable. "

Guy's theory - a simple explanation of complex processes
Aggression generates aggression. Nobody canceled this truth. But I would look at the guy's theory on the other plane.

Those global changes that we see now are the result of more global processes on Earth. The human factor imposes its imprint on climate change, but does not define it.

Earth is a really very complex single organism - superorganism! And this body is constantly developing, evolving: energy is growing on the planet, climate change and so on. The process of the evolution of the Earth is complex and irreversible!

Earth as superorganism has a "mind". Scientists say that water (and it takes 71% of the surface of the Earth) has some "memory" (works by Professor Masaru Emoto (Masaru Emoto), the film "Great Mystery of Water"): accumulates information in itself. Circles on the fields (maybe they arise on water), UFOs are the "natural" manifestations of the "Mind" of the Earth, this is a "dialogue" of land with man. Our planet speaks about its development, pushing the person to follow her. And the person must understand this, for his own survival ...

Man and Earth is a single whole! One implies a single development. A person should use what his land gives him. In this regard, the statements about the possible relocation of a person on other planets are not very clear to me. It will not be able to live outside his land!

On the topic "Earth and Man" can be said for a very long time. But one thing is clear, Guy will never "fight" with a man. It only warns (the land "is smarter" of a person) and directs us to the desired path of development, on the path that we must pass to live further on our great land.
http://blog.artnn.ru/2006/06/24/Teoriya-Gayya-Gaia-Theory/

If a person open everything that gives "memory",

since she also passes these stages of "birth" as a sign of becoming ...

Planet Earth

"If a person discovers everything that gives" Memory ",
then the planet Earth will not endure such loads by either energy or according to information,
since she also passes these stages of "birth" as a sign of becoming ... "
http://bessmerten.ru/bessmertie/earth.htm.

The creation of the planet Earth did not require training, as the "thought" participated in this project, at the expense of which the whole plan "time" was built ...

The disclosure of life begins with the planet Earth and is finally formed on other planets, where there is its own infinity and authenticity of the development of thought as an integral, the value of which is in the memory of life ...

The land is the main thing for life "around" and is not intended for a person: it is intended for the life of "energy".

The man "carries" energy, therefore lives on earth, fundamentally developing its capabilities as a background of a stable level of energy sales ...

Earth and man
Man and Planet Earth are the same, only in different languages \u200b\u200bof the "time" as well as the spheres of life, where there is its own result and genuine fame in knowledge about "time" ...

Earth is a "man" in the radius of its capabilities ...

Everything lives those "beginning", which is programmed by the development of life. The land is present in the time when it is already the Sun and is the inexplicable "beginning", from which "everything" goes on the growing cycle of its development ...

Everything lives simultaneously in three versions - the last, future and present and the level where there is no past and the future, but there are a single integer as the general employment of the life of all "spaces", where intangible as material is formed at the same time ...

Everything develops at the same time: there is neither "beginning", there is no "end": there is only a point of reference from the beginning and on the end, where the values \u200b\u200bof knowledge of their future as the past and the present are formed ...

All civilizations have the same "code" of their development and develop at the same time, and this code is life that begins to form its formation on the planet Earth ...

The planet Earth revealed the "man": he gave her his "fire", his "energy", his "time". In this, "Memory" helped him, in which he reached his "perfection", the level of which exceeds all the parameters of life on all planets immediately ...

"Man" gave planet Earth All: water, air, "energy", "sleep", transforming these opportunities under its version of the "time" ...

The man on Earth is a temporary version of his life: he only connects himself to the planet Earth to carry the energy of the trance and hypnosis into the unearthly civilization "sleep", having gone to this main issue of life ...

What formula does a person live on the planet Earth?
100% "time" \u003d 80% hypnosis + 20% trance

This is a system of not one life that is fixed at the subconscious level. Trans opens the possibilities of one version of life, hypnosis - many lives.

Planet Earth

Was Mars on the Earth variant?
- No, but the water option was. Lupto nature was developed, but there was no man there.

What is letteo nature?
- This is a strong development of a magnetic field in the form of large energies.

The arrival of material time ... Where did this phenomenon come from?
- "Water" .. A person knows her in "Memory" of his development within himself ...

Does there exist or existed the planet "water"?
- Yes, this option was opened, and a person knows it. Planet "WATER" was the same version of the life of the Earth with a man. Man ... Three times "born" through "water". How to understand this, and what level of development he went out or came out ... And this person lives here?
- Not...

Why is there such a message about this?
- Since the fluid world of the body has a big "memory" about everything, and on the planet "Water", a person was present in the variant of the fluid field or body ... Earth has, and there will always always be a memory of the water "Water". Planet "Water" is Planet Mars. In the first cycle of its development, it was a planet "water" ...

This means that your "pulse" is configured to create. This is the experience of your opportunities where immortality is kept. This also gives you to the material, giving you to see and feel your eternity of life, having determined the rest of your "breath" and "exhale" ...

Not everything is fixed in dreams, but the main thing is fixed by "dreams", opening the value of the Earth's time ...
Only then there is a way to immortality where the sound of the meaning of "sleep" is involved as the most apparent and probable that there is in hypnosis "meaning" ... As far as the person sees this truth - the search for a large-scale and global in life is so and revealed ... the earth itself fixes This stream, giving a person to know a specific task of life, where only the actual search is calculated, but there is a high level of perfection, ahead of consciousness for 100 or more centuries ...

This is the global speed of development of consciousness, in which hypnosis participates, confirming the faith in itself, where there is a confidence in knowledge about himself and about that scale, which proceeds in the subconscious, as the Earth itself participates in his evolution ...

Nature is given to see everything, hear and know, and in this program there is a sound ... it gives and opens the concept of intangible ... it is a high adaptability of consciousness to the topic of life ...

Life is repeated, but what?
- In the "idea" of the presence of "time", definitely reminding the way ...

Full knowledge of the land gives a subconscious time where "sound", which gives thoughts, a new meaning, followed by hypnosis "Visiony" ...

Everything works stably if the Earth itself gives a person a life of hypnosis in which the thought is developing ...

The most important thing is that search, where everything is summed at the expense of the summer ... and hypnosis sounds in this meaning, revealing knowledge of land through intuition ...
The most active space is for a person the sun ... But the earth for the Sun is an active space ... In such an equilibrium and balance, all the structures of the earth work, highlighting the "fluid" of the sunlight as the potential of the exact vision of the "time" ...

It is enough to say that the sun is an active satellite of the Earth, as it is concentrated in it all the action of the "time" ... Transforming the work of hypnosis, a person opens the world of his intuition, thanks to which a person sees the nature of the Earth ...

The growth trends in the "space" claim that there is something "something" that manages the heart ... And this "something" is always the earth, in which there is a realization of the large-scale life of hypnosis ... not participating, but participating, man He knows his capabilities, as the time of immortality flows ... This is the option when a person will fully feel his hypnosis, translating it into his nature of life on Earth, including infinity in this concept ...