UN Flag Flat Earth. Flat Earth. Call to action

Subject " Flat Earth»It seems funny for you? Then I remind you. Just 500 years ago, anyone knew that the land was flat, and those who said that the Earth was a round, seriously risked. At best, friends, acquaintances and relatives were watched on him as "Lunatic". In the worst, religious fanatics burned it on the fire.

Now this story has a continuation ...

Land again became FlatBut now no one will burn you the majority of people still will not understand what is written, because they did not learn to think their heads. However, it is not about you. And react to the article with humor.

Piece: "Flattems are applied to a retaliatory blow."

Scene 2.: "Flat Earth Proof."

Characters:

Professor Sharov — (PSh ). Talked about Round Earth. . I hope you have seen his official answers. Because now it will begin what we love on this site most - "Melting our reality «.

Professor wonderful — (PZ. ). Talks about flat land. Right now.

You - Simple buyer.

I read the scene 1?

1. Our world.

You : Good afternoon, Professor wonderful (PZ. ), i just talked with your colleague ball about our world, and somehow it looked not quite convincing 100%. What do you have?

PZ. : I have a model and Map of flat land. She looks like this.

PZ. : Our world is a flat disk that surrounds the icy wall. Therefore, the water does not take away anywhere and fall off the edge. The ice wall is officially called Antarctic, covers the entire disk as far as it goes into depth - we do not know, maybe before infinity. Or maybe through a hundred kilometers there is life there. Military closed Antarctica special contract from 1959. Therefore, there is so easy not to get. Alas.

Flat Land Map officially in science is called Azimuthal projection.

More details: The "Dome" is covered on top of us - the construction under which the sun and the moon rotate, plus the other "planets". The height of the dome is 5 thousand km. The moon rotates just below the sun. Stars - light bulbs on the dome.

You : Clear. Professor of balls, do not remind your version?

PSh.: Earth - Planet, on which we live, and our model is called Globe, with Latin Globus -\u003e Ball. Surface - 29% sushi, 71% - water. The simplified model of the earth looks like this.

PSh. : The sun is 99.86% of the mass of the entire solar system, is in the center. Planet rotate around the sun. Earth is the third planet from the sun. Visually below.

You : Clear. Refresh the memory. Question to you PZ. . There are generally accepted evidence that is customary to tell in schools, as a confirmation that the Earth is round. Can you refute them or show an alternative explanation?

PZ. : Yes of course. Show your evidence, I will comment on them.

Moreover, I'm ready to pay 1000 dollars to the one who will refute evidence that land is flat. You are interested?

You : Yes, i want to earn 1000 USD, if you do not joke. But first refute the evidence of the Round Earth. Ready?

PZ.: I seriously suggest a deal. Ready.

You: Proof 1.. Ships go beyond the horizon and disappears first the case, and then the sail disappears. Is this not the proof of the curvature of the earth's surface?

PZ.: No, not proof. The ship simply decreases on the horizon and disappears as soon as it passes point of convergence", That is, goes for" skyline of Visibility ». You can return it back if you take binoculars.

How the vision arranged.

The object that is distinguished from you reaches the point on the horizon when it is too small so that you will distinguish at least something. Here is the point in the center in the picture, where the road is compressed to the point. This point is called « point of convergence «, point, where parallel lines in the eye converge. Such our eyesight on Earth.

We use 2 eyes to determine the distance to the object.

That is, the further object from us, the more it will be less. And even 2 parallel lines are still deleted and decrease to Points of convergence lens eyes. This skill is very useful for hunter predators (we, in the past). Determine the distance to extraction or danger .

Even 1 eye is still able to show us a distance, because the light passes through the edges of the lens (points 1, 2, 3, 4). Pupil \u003d Round lens, not a narrow slot. Therefore, even 1 eye is very cool!

We see the object at a distance of 7 km on the horizon. The physical dimensions of the pupil do not allow to see on.

Practice.

Here are 2 parallel railways. They are parallel to each other thousands of kilometers forward, Path Do not intersect, do not approach each other at allOtherwise, the train would not be able to ride the weeks on the Transibirsk highway from Moscow to Vladivostok.

But, you see how 4 parallel rails are going to the point on the horizon, right? So with the ship. The curvature here is neither. The curvature is the most primitive way to explain all these effects.

Consider what to see the ship in distant and above the horizon can interfere with hot air or water vapor.

Here, for example, the phenomenon of Mirage. When the effect of the hot road hangs, as if the wet puddle is hanging. I think everyone saw him in his life. The average dividing strip disappears in " puddle«.

Object, the car machine will blur and decrease With distance. The wheels will disappear first, because the closer to the ground, although the road is absolutely even in front of you. The same is at sea.

Water and wind create waves. Waves breaking about the surface of the water create a lot of small splashes and all this mass hanging over the sea surface. It is clear that the first over the thick mass, the fog of the droplets, the sail will rise. After all, you look almost parallel to the surface of the water. And the sail is the highest object on the ship. The closer the ship will be to you, the higher the surface of the water will be a sail. Although, initially, you see the entire ship on the horizon. Just because of small splashes (the distance to kilometers to the ship) you will not see his body until it becomes close enough. With the same success, you can try to look through the fog. Will it work out?

You : According to evidence 1: features of vision, "point of convergence" + Mirage + water vapor.

Proof 2.: Moon and lunar eclipses. We see how the semicircular shadow from the ground can be placed on the moon during eclipses. A semicircular shadow gives a ball or a disk of the Earth to the moon, and on your theory of the sun and the moon are above us. What then causes an eclipse in your model?

PZ. : Solar eclipse explain easy. The sun and the moon rotate in orbit over our head. And the moon is slightly lower than the Sun, so when their path intersects, then we see like a semicircular shadow (moon), mounted in the sun, and we have a black sun before your eyes.

At the expense of the lunar eclipse.

Start with the fact that Moon by her own anomalous Object Object . You never surprised that we see always only 1 side of the Moon? Why is that? Perfect orbit synchronization? -\u003e or it artificial object? Why is everything in nature tied to the moon? Planting, migration in animals, even the same female cycles are ideally synchronized with the cycles of the moon, which last 28 days? Isn't it because of this, women are shifting "women's days" for 4-5 days by the beginning of the month?

In a word, the moon is a very strange object and does not behave like a regular piece of stone over his head. By the way, the scientific moon is satellite land. And satellite can be either artificial (turned on with its dish antenna to us) or natural.

We become children for a minute. What about the fact that the moon was built by previous civilizations? We do not know this, but also modern scientists do not know how the moon was in heaven. The impact version of the meteorite about the Earth is nonsense. Because there is on the moon WATER . When the explosion, from the impact of the meteorite about the ground, and then flying in vacuum, water not formed! So what is joke then? Just make sure that it can be artificial sphere with its source of light.

We do not see the opposite side of the moon? And what's in there?

You : Presented (fantasy), let the moon - an artificial object, as in your version. Go ahead.

Proof 3.. During Lunar phases we see semicircle in heaven and during Lunar eclipse We see semicirclelyuly shadow, that is, it gives it a semicircular object, "sphere / ball / disk" as you want. How do you explain it?

PZ. : These are 2 different phenomena: lunar phases and lunar eclipse.

As for the lunar phases, when you have crescents in the sky, not a complete moon, it is explained by the lighting of the moon. The earth is not with what. The moon is a ball sphere, and the spherical body will be covered. For example, the "lamp" which is located For moon. Will now beexperiment with iPhone 5.

Imagine that there is a lamp inside the moon. And she turns. Do not you see such phases?

As for the lunar eclipse, I have already answered in the previous example. There is a third body or phenomenon that we do not yet know. For example, the moon has its own light source InsideAnd between the light and the surface there is a semicircular disc, obscure light. Moreover, its size can be thousands of times less than the moon itself. For this you do not need the sun.

By the way, the moon does not reflect the sunlight, as official scientists declare, and is the source of its Own Lights, easy to install on this example. If you have a sphere (ball), then we know perfectly well, as the light will be reflected from it. Like this.

I did not see a stain on the moon. And you?

You : Proof 4.. Around the world? Slow or fly all the time east or west, you will arrive at the same point where you started swimming. Isn't that talking about round earth?

PZ. : Simple experiment. Take a plate with water, in the middle of the plates, put a powerful magnet, lower a small boat with a compass and move to the west. You move only to the west, and make a round-the-world trip to the plate!

Here is tea with lemon. If the lemon slices will twist around the center, while remaining the leather to the edge of the cup, then it will do " trip around the world"On your cup.

Schematically: you all the time moving to the West. Magnetic compass always shows to the north .

This looks around the world journey over flat earth.

That's how the journey of Fernanda Magellan around the Earth 1519-1522.

You: Proof 5.. If everyone body Over our head Round, why should we think that our Land flat?

PZ. : Here is a billiard table on which round balls are. Table, in your logic \u003d round?

You : Table, naturally, smooth,

Proof 6.. Availability of time beltsWhen in the same parts of the planet night, and in other parts of the planet - day. How to explain? Isn't it turning round earth?

PZ. : Not. And then turn the turn? The sun is moving above the surface of a flat land, in the place where it is light. Where it is not - there is night.

Why the sun does not illuminate the entire disk if it is at the height? Very simple. Here is a light bulb that does not illuminate the whole wall. The wall is too big as the ground surface.

Inscriptions:

IF A Land flat
Why do not we see sunlight 24 hours a day?

Explanation:

For the same reason, on which a small lamp cannot illuminate the entire wall.

Light source \u003d small + moving.

You : How do seasons work? Why is it cold in winter, and in the summer it is hot?

PZ. : The sun moves from the north to the south throughout the year. When we are hot - the sun moves along a yellow trajectory close to the North Pole (Cancer Tropic). When we are cold, it rotates around the red trajectory (Capricorn tropic), far from the North Pole, but it is hot in the southern hemisphere. And, yes, the sun moves much faster in the southern hemisphere so that in 24 hours to do its 360 degrees.

The fact that we have winter in December, and in Australia - summer, says this picture. Christmas - December 21 in Australia celebrate in Santa Claus costumes right on the beach.

You : Then do not leave the sun and the evidence of a flat land. I am interested in 2 more things: Polar day and Polar night. When 24 hours a day - light, and 24 hours a day - dark. You know this phenomenon, right? In official science, this is explained by the slope of the Earth by 24.5 degrees and the location of the Earth regarding the Sun.

PZ. : Polar day - It's when the sun does not sit beyond the horizon 24 hours. That is, it spins over the horizon line, approaching the horizon, but not disappearing under it.

Interestingly, photos of the polar day and night most often show from the North PoleBut very rarely when they are shown from the South Pole. Do you know why? Because within the framework of the theory of flat lands, the Sun does not illuminate the South Pole 24 hours a day. But with the North Pole there is no problems.

Here is an example.

How to check the southern polar day?

In no way.

The South Pole is closed to visit, closed to check. There are only governmental "Scientific stations" and " military". And the first and second ( government + Military) Known as liarswith a long-long history ... I do not tell you. So there remains only 2 options:

1. On the South Pole there are no such days when the sun is 24 hours over the horizon.

2. On the South Pole there is a polar day when the sun is 24 hours over the horizon.

But, even if it is really shown that the polar day in Antarctica is there, then we have a theory. It uses the concept of reflected light from the dome. Schematically and mathematically looks like this.

By the way, since already started talking for Antarctica, then there is some unhealthy interest in it Earth elite .

Chronicle for 2016:

1. February 12, 2016 patriarch Kirill Meets in Pope Roman. February 18, 2016 - urgently flies to Antarctica.
2. Beginning of March 2016 - US President Obama flies to Argentina, where do you travel for several days by Patagonia . The territory borders with Antarctica, which he did a couple of days - unknown. In the delegation with him there was a representative of NASA.
3. 11-12 November 2016 - US Secretary John Kerry 3 days after the elections in the United States - flying to Antarctica and is there, signing the next agreement For which the entrance of fishing vessels in the water near Antarctica is prohibited.

Some strange stagnation around the icy wastelands among politicians and religious figures. Do not find?

But, it will leave aside. Let's return to the Sun and the evidence of a flat land.

You : Interesting, but this is later. Now M. yenia is interested in the fact that the sun should decrease in size if it is simply removed from us, and not to enter the horizon with a huge disk with the same dimensions. After all, you say that the sun is just moving on our head on a circular trajectory.

PZ. : Let's talk seriously about the sun.

This video will be enough to prove that the sun decreases in size, removing from us in a straight line when it goes to the horizon. Shot from the observatory above the level of the clouds. Link .

Now look here. You must understand that we are very often visible the sun, which sits above the ground level. Mountains, hills, obstacles, buildings often close our review. And since they are much closer to them than to the real horizon, then you see how big and round sun hides behind the "visible" horizon, although on the fact it is just Removes in a straight line and Decreases.

Decreases Before the "point of convergence".

In this case, the "point of convergence" goro closed. Therefore, the sun is hidden by a big disc from our review, but still decreasing along the way.

Here simple experimentin evidence of a flat land, you can make it at home. Tension the thread through the room so that it has the same height from the wall and to the wall. Put the obstacles on its path, such as a book or board (in this video it is 4 bottles of beer that keep cardboard), and that the obstacle is below the thread. And then look from the ground level, as it looks.

Get here is the "effect".

The sun will be removed from you, and a lot to leave "for the visible horizon", not a point. That's all. No turn of Round Earth for this is not necessary.

This experiment Did you not impressed you?

Good, then what is the scope of such obstacles on the horizon as IPhone 6.? Camera on Earth, 110 meters from Camera to Human? Consider that in our case IPhone is a mountain.

A person is visible behind the mountain.

You : And the last question about the Sun and the Moon - how do they fly along the side orbit? What keeps them in the sky?

PZ. : Magnetic levitation. Here are working devices with magnetic levitation.

Lamp
computer mouse,
armchair sofa ,
maglev train on a magnetic pillow.

This, by the way, explains and tides and fetches on the ground. Water is repelled from magnets ! And the moon and the sun \u003d sources of magnetic background, so they just " spread water» under himAnd she runs ashore. Gravity here, as always, is superfluous. Tides and falsites are only in the oceans and seas with salt water, which are located on the way of the sun and the moon.

At home, check how ordinary water from under the tap reacts to the discourse. Just before you spend on the hair to transfer the electric discharge

In the crane - ordinary fresh water! And marine water - even better reacts to electricity. There isoooooooool!

Tides and low-rise attitudes for the gravity of the moon do not have. Because Samoa Gravity Does not exist at all. This is a fantasy Newton and fictional force, how to describe the world and facts at the beginning of the 19th century. This is how the electromagnetic repulsion of the moon and water looks like. Schematically.

You:Proof 7.. Photo from satellites? Photo from height? Do you still say that the earth is flat?

PZ. : Have you heard about special effects in the photo? And lenses "fish eye", right? These lenses strongly twist the image to cover the large area. Here are some examples:

1. Remons Round walls? Below \u003d without distortion.

4. Round metro wagons.

5. The spire of the church is bowed to the right

6. The area bends ...

Horizon \u003d Curivan.

So what does proof of spherical land look like?

Now returning to space and the ISS. Here is a picture for 2008. Where NASA recognizes , that pictures are made through the "fisheye". These lenses stand at the world station. Come in, check.

Here the same picture in Wikipedia , where it says that the curvature of the Earth at the expense of "Fish Eye".

Why use if the earth is round?

That's right to curb the flat image, such as proof of curvature.

Although all photos, no corrections tell us about the opposite. Earth - flat! From any height!

You : Proof 8.. Sharovers argue that we see the height further, because we see for the horizon.

PZ. : Absolutely stupid argument from chaserovers (like all others, by the way). Why?

Because

Here is an example - a smooth lawn near the house. If you put the camera at the ground level and move away from it, then you " load for the horizon". Is it proof that the smooth field suddenly appeared curvature? Not. Link to video .

You : I like this explanation. Accurate and with evidence.

Proof 9.. And nevertheless, what about satellites? Communication / satellite television / GPS? How are they explained on flat land?

PZ. : The relationship between continents without wires was long before the satellites. The first transatlantic radio communication was successfully committed in 1906, from Brand of Rock, USA in Makhry, Scotland. No one has ever heard about the satellites for the next 50 years, and the continents have already communicated among themselves.

Today, 99% of all Internet traffic goes through underwater ocean cables between continents, and not through satellites.

Satellite antennas at home are only called "satellite," because they all look at the horizon, and not in the sky, at an angle of 90%. You see such antennas every day at home and roofs, right? Do they look vertically up, in the sky on the satellite?

Or ---------\u003e on the horizon?

"These antennas" take ordinary radio signals from conventional transmitting steels standing on the groundBut not from space. Antenna slope is clear well?

What you see with your own eyes on houses is called " tropospheric "Radio communication.

Distance "Tropospheric Radiocommunication" - 300-800 km. The signal is fought off the ionosphere. The fact that modern scientists call the "ionosphere", I call the "dome". This is a dome over a flat earth, which beats the radio wave down, to the ground.

And all that is less than 300-800 km, can be covered with additional 300 meter towers, as below in the figures. The signal "on the plate" goes from radio.

Do you recognize these creations of engineering thoughts with a height of 200-300 m?

Why do you need satellites for TV? Everything works without them.

You : What about GPS and flat land?

PZ. : GPS - Global Positioning System. Its only purpose is to convince you that she " Global ", That is \u003d globe, that is, the ball! How does she work?

In cities, she works at the expense of mobile messaging. And 3 tower is enough to determine your location exactly to the meter. It is called - Triangulation .

Outside of cities, there is a regular radio network with powerful testers, which cover most of the land. First used during World War II for navigating ships and aircraft when no one heard about satellites the next 20 years... Accuracy of the ship definition in the sea - 150 meters at a distance of 1,500 km! Name - Loran. and Decca. . Come in, check.

Here is a tower Loran. 190 meters high in Canada.

In 2000 they were renamed GPS. And they put in your mobile phone with beautiful cards. The system is managed by American military, and how it works in fact - you will never know. Just as you do not know why I drowned the atom of "Kursk", and how many full-time military Russians died in Donbas and Syria. The military always listened.

As you understood, the positioning systems successfully worked until even ideas ... satellites ...

You: Someone knows about this theory?

PZ. : Everybody knows. This is not a secret. For example, NASA in its calculations and models of flight of aircraft in the air uses a model of a flat and unwilling ground.

That is, future pilots are taught on models that did not hear about what to take into account the curvature, or that the surface of the earth rotates under them. Why? Because it is not really.

You can download the document . E. it is written on the first page in the first paragraph.

Here is another document for FAA (Federal Aviation Administration, United States), where it is said that the software for simulators simulation should be as close as possible to reality, for high-quality training of pilots in the air, learning dispatchers on Earth. Therefore, everything should be for sure in calculations.

There are also different situations and aircraft behavior in the sky. "The Engineering Analysis and Design of the Aircraft Dynamics Model for the Faa Target Generation Facility".You can download.

On page 32 it is written by direct text: " we do not take into account the rotation of the earth, and the flight passes over flat land«.

Simulation as close as possible to reality, right?

So what is our reality, dear pilots?

Official cards?

Here is official map of flat land For a wide range of users. Created by B. 1892 year, a paper copy is kept in the library of Boston, USA. What is interesting in it?

3 Moment!

Moment 1. : Immediately at the top of the card with large letters is written

"AS IT IS"

what does " actually »

Moment 2.: On the right and the left is said: " scientific faithful« (scientFically and. ) and " practically loyal« (practically Correct. ). Seriously

Moment 3.. At the bottom of the card indicated how the sun is moving in June and December. Where do they come from June 21 and December 21.

Solstice June.

« White oval shows the location of the Sun in the tropic of cancer (Tropic of Cancer), in June, at noon. This causes 24 hours of sunlight in the polar regions (polar day). After June 21, the sun begins to move along the spiral south until it reaches its final point on December 21«

Solstice December.

« On December 21, the sun moves along the tropic of Capricorn, and during the movement illuminates the southern part of the Antarctic ice. It is no light below 80º southern latitude, there are only unexplored ice regions. On December 23, the Sun completes his movement to the south and begins to move back to the North Pole, completing its season. "

In addition, all the most serious organizations in the world of the UN type - Organization of the United Nations, ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization, IMO - International Maritime Organization, WMO - World Meteorological Organization use a flat land map. Irony, truth?

Organizations controlling the globe,
Used map of flat land..

Question per million: "Can Antarctica find here"?

Pilots.

Seawokes.

Climatologists.

Found Antarctica?

And it is considered 6 continent of the earth, actually ...

Google showed the original drawing on the winter solstice . So, by the way. Nothing special here.

2. Question 2.. What experiment was carried out to identify gravity? - answer. There is nothing to check, the gravity does not exist, it is a fictional force that is only on paper.

3. Question 3.. How does the water in the oceans be twisted on the arc? - answer. In no way. Water in the oceans in a horizontal position, from the North Pole to Antarctica.

4. Question 4.. Is the curvature of land take into account during the construction of long bridges, rails, shipping channels and pipelines? - Answer. No not taken into account, because there is no curvature. There is only height.

5. Question 5. . Physics of the XXI century. Standard model Elementary particles of our universe (in short, how everything works in the world) includes only 3 forces: electromagnetic, weak and strong interactionDoes not include gravity in their calculations. - Answer. It does correctly, which does not include, because gravity does not exist.

6 . Question 6.. How did the cosmos vacuum succeeded atmosphere? - Answer. Atmosphere protected by a dome.

7. Question 7. Why does the gravity do not attract clouds? - answer. Different air density in the earth and air at height.

9. Question 9.. How rivers (water) can flow UP? - Answer. You can not and you know it. Water always flows down.

10. Question 10.. Why are airplanes so strangely fly? - answer.

Regarding the first example, Flight Bali - Los Angeles, Sorting in Alaska. Here map of flat land And direct between the two cities.

Regarding routes through Antarctica. Where to fly something?

Fly in a circle? From Africa to Australia - fuel is not enough. From South America to Australia - fuel is not enough. From Africa to South America - fuel is not enough. Keep in mind that Antarctica in a circle goes to a distance much more than the equator. And the equator itself is 40,000 km around the circumference!

But this is so flying in a straight line - the most it is!

Therefore, the optical Internet cable no one will pull from Africa to Australia and South America. This is sooooo far. Red zones are empty.

You : Oh well. Governments are aware that the land is flat. They also have evidence of a flat land, a flat land map, then what is the benefit to hide the truth?

PZ. : Because there will be a disaster in science.

No gravity \u003d no globe \u003d no rotation \u003d no big explosion \u003d no millions of galaxies, planets and stars \u003d no aliens \u003d no evolution \u003d no link between live organisms and people \u003d this is enough to keep silent about the form of the Earth?

Gravity is a religion for scientists. All that cannot be explained is clearly explained by the mysterious word gravity. From Religion Do not refuse!

Why land round? — Gravitis .
Why don't people fly away from a rotating earth? - Gravitis .
Why water does not fly away from the ground and is not going to the equator, where is the maximum speed? - Gravitis .
Why is the moon in the sky? - Gravitis .

Replace the word " Gravitis "Word" God «, and get the same result. Explanations of the level " ZERO «.

Why land round? — God decided to say .
Why don't people fly away from a rotating earth? — God decided so.
Why is water not going to the equator where the maximum speed? — God decided to say .
Why is the moon in the sky? — God decided so.

Say in secret:

« Gravity is a force that attracts absurdity«.

Do you know why?

Because after Newton came up with Gravity, science has developed so last 300 years.

Scientists understood thatgravity theory will lead to a singularity (the whole universe will be squealing, in the end, to the point) then they invented "Dark energy." This is, in principle, anti-gravity. But as a result of further calculations of the formula, they realized that the expansion "Dark energy" will lead to the rupture of the "space-time" of Einstein, and then invented "Dark matter", which must be balanced "Gravitons" gravity and "Dark energy".

Before us - fictional force, which should explain another fictional force and so over time When the formulas are not glued.

And in fact: "Gravitons" do not exist, from here, dark energy does not exist, he does not exist from here. And when you are forced to believe in things that exist only on paper and in dreams, it is not science, it is -"Magic".

Therefore, physics for 2017 rushed his forehead into the wall and waiting for the new prophet, who would explain what and how. Without "gravitations" and other "magical entities".

And what do we?

And we need other answers to the questions old as the world: "Who are we?", And "What have you forgotten here?" Without "magic", "gravity" and "theories of monkey-people".

The origin of the world:

1. Divine version of the world. You heard about her, the world for 6 days. Bible.

2. version - Big Explosion with Evolution proposed priest George Lemeter)) and Darwin.

"There was nothing, then suddenly nothing happened to anything and nothing exploded! Then, all the blown and scattered, nothing magically transformed himself into the matter and living particles, which were more magically learned to copy themselves, multiply ... And then there were dinosaurs ...

How do you like the theory from Catholics from the Vatican? It is considered official "in science" for 2017. Seriously!

More options?

3. The most obvious - theory , about which we wrote quite recently. We live in the matrix (digital universe), and it seems that this is a game for our distant descendants, for example children 2100. People of the future play the game of the past. As we play computer games about Greece, feudalism and the Middle Ages. And our descendants play in us - with 100% immersion in the virtual reality of the past. How fantastic it did not sound.

Generally.

PSh. : You will not be able to drag your theory of flat land In official science. She is absurd.
3025 votes 72%

Poll Options Are Limited Because JavaScript is Disabled in Your Browser.

Interestingly, it seems to me that such a solid world structure as the United Nations Some of us hides? Or rather, does not even hide, because this information is in relevant, but simply does not agree. Do not see anything strange in the image of the emblem of this organization? You do not confuse anything and does not cause any associations? And now let's compare these images.

This is an image of a flat land and it is completely identical to the image on the UN emblem. I hope all people with normal vision see it perfectly. It turns out that on the emblem of this organization, which is considered to be visible "face" and the official analogue of the "global government", our planet is clearly depicted flat, and not in the form of a ball, as it interprets official science.

Those., On its emblem, it is the same flat land, the hypothesis of which is officially considered "delusion" and "Lzhenauka". And all the official textbooks "for general use" convince us that the Earth is a spherical body. But why then the UN as its official emblem uses precisely flat land? And after all, not only the UN. It is exactly the same images on the emblems of some other organizations.

Maybe we "do not catch up"? I am not a supporter of the hypothesis of a "flat land", but when I read the "100 evidence of a flat land", I noticed that, along with obviously "attracted after the ears," among them there are those that, at least, make thinking about Are our textbooks tell us the truth? Or maybe there is a science "for general use" and is there science "for chosen"?

And then, do not want to say numerous "fighters with Lzhenauche" that the UN and other organizations that use the emblem of a flat land are more stupid or deliberately trying to mislead people with the help of "Lzhenayuki" and "superstitions"? I am more inclined to think that simply from us some information is hidden. And all the others let them think themselves and their own brains.

It is hardly possible to uncover the universe. And even the fact that at first glance seems an immutable truth, in some cases it may be very controversial. In favor of political, economic and moral and ethical interests no longer causes such surprise, because the concept of alternative history every day is becoming more and more adherents. And even those who have recently believed in fairy tales on existence and Peter I, today they are no longer so confident in support of their convictions.

And what if not only the story is distorted? Modern geography, geodesy Other sciences erected an idea to the rank of axiom that the land is round, however, this theory has its opponents. At first glance, the idea of \u200b\u200bflat land can be perceived as a joke, that's only her adherents lead more and more convincing evidence in favor of their theory, which look quite logical and reasonable. Is it so, or still in this case science is not lying? Who knows…

Flat Earth Theory: Basic Concepts

The essence of this theory reveals its name itself. According to the suggestions of the plane earth, the globe is a round disk, the center of which is the North Pole. But the southern pole on this map is in principle no - instead there is a high icy wall, which is looking for the land area. What is behind this wall is a mystery. Some suggest that only the ice and eternal Merzlot are behind it, others believe that there is a parallel life of other inhabitants of the planet, but the third believe that the wall serves as a fence that there is nothing with a smooth account. A card visually reflecting a flat land is called azimuth.

The diameter of the planet is 40,000 kilometers. Above this huge disk, like a dome, constellations, sun and moon rises. And so that the day go to your woman, and the day was replaced at night, the planet itself rotates, and the dome located directly above it. That is why constellations move overnight, a mysterious and cold moon comes to replace the bright sun, and the sunrise and the sunset regularly alternate.

And since the sun is constantly moving, the usual ideas about the solar system are not entitled to exist. In the concept of flat land, the solar system is not considered in principle, since the rotation of the Sun is carried out with a mad speed, and the planets simply could not fly behind it and rotate relative to their own axis. As a weighty argument, the strength of attraction of the planets is also. If you believe modern scientists, the land ranks third among the planets arranged around the sun. But according to the laws of physics, the strength of attraction is directly related to the mass, and therefore, the smaller the size of the planet, the closer it should be to the sun. After conducting uncomplicated mathematical calculations, it can be understood that the Earth should not be on the third, but in the sixth place. Then our world would enhance the eternal Merzlot, because the atmosphere was simply physically able to warm enough for a comfortable maintenance of life.

But if everything is arranged exactly as the adepts of the theory of flat land see, as to be with flights into space, numerous photographs of the Earth, made from outer space, data on other planets and other information, clearly demonstrating the device of the universe. According to the plane earth, all this is nothing more than fiction, setting and huge scales. Illusion created by masons allows you to hide the truth from the population. An image of Apollo-11 is one of the evidence of this assumption, on which Americans allegedly flew to the moon. With a detailed increase, it is possible to consider that the spacecraft is made of "primary materials" - foil, slats, cylinders, cardboard, etc. In essence, it is just a decoration designed for the shooting of astronauts, which, by the way, did not even bother to remove the decorations (bracelets and rings), on which the engraved letter G inside the circular and the square is a symbol of the Masonic movement.

And pictures of Mars? The unreal and mysterious beauty of this mysterious planet in the opinion of adherents of the theory of flat land - no more than photo filters, the game of light and shadows, classic computer programs that any "advanced" schoolboy can work. If you remove the effects of photoshop from these pictures, it will turn out very beautiful, but still quite real landscapes, removed in remote corners of the earth, untouched by the hand of a person.

A little story, or from where the theory of flat land is drawn from?

At first glance, it may seem that the theory of the flat form of our planet is no more than a fashion trend, which now has been divorced on the Internet. However, this is not at all like this: peering through the prism of history, you can track how the opinion about the form of the Earth changed. The mention of this theory was found in the ancient mythology of Egypt and Babylon, Hindu and Buddhist Scriptures, Scandinavian epic. And even ancient philosophers whose teachings are considered to be a historical heritage, among which Levkipp and his student of democritus were firmly sure that the land is flat. The same ideas were adhered to the ancient manuscript of the Book of Enoch found in Kumran. However, over time, these beliefs gave way to astronomical knowledge, and the idea of \u200b\u200bflat land has sunk in the fly.

In the Middle Ages, the question of the form of the Earth has become discussed. One of the bright examples of this idea was the "Christian Topography", written by mowed Indicoplast in 535-547. In it, the planet is represented as a rectangular plane, on top of which the dome is located: "Some people who cover the name Christians claim, at the same time with the pagan philosophers that the sky has a spherical shape. Without a doubt, these people misled the eclipses of the Sun and the Moon. " This work in translation was widespread in Russia, because at the time it was a unique encyclopedia of medieval knowledge, not to believe that there was no reason.

One of the visual examples of the theory was the engraving, published in the book "Atmosphere: Popular Meteorology", published from under the pen of French astronomer Camille Flammarion in 1888. It depicts a pilgrim that reached the edge of the Earth and looks out from under the dome to meet new worlds. The signature to the image reads the following: "Missionary Middle Ages says that he found a point where the sky concerns the Earth."

How was the Flat Earth Society?

In the 19th century, the adherents of the described concept were united into the group - the Society of Flat Earth, - at the head of which the English scientist Samuel Roubotham stood. For several decades, he spent all sorts of experiences, experiments, research in confirmation of his theory and, which is important, found a lot of evidence. Using the pseudonym Pararallax, he wrote "zettical and astronomy", in which it is thoroughly and available all its developments and results that refute the spherical shape of the planet. Initially, the small labor of Roubotam was reprinted several times, becoming more and more evidentiary literature, because it was constantly complemented by students of society. Before the death of Samuel Roubotham defended his theory, conducting numerous lectures and seminars around the world.

The Adepts of Roubotham Theory subsequently united into an universal zettic society, which found its adherents in all corners of the planet. Since 1956, this organization headed by Semuelchenton again became referred to as a society of flat land, but with a significant prefix "international". When Schenon saw the photographs of the globe with the orbit, he did not doubt himself in his convictions: "It is easy to see how the photos of such a variety can fool out of the unfair man."

Since 1971, the head of the organization was Charles Johnson. He launched a major campaign to promote his ideas, handed out leaflets, released brochures and booklets, in which he defended the model of a flat land. Thanks to such activity, during his leadership, supporters of theory has become several times more.

Arguments in favor of the theory of flat land

To take a reasonable decision on the form of our planet, the arguments of both parties should be considered, finding out which of them are the most reasonable and consistent. So, what they say about their theory of plane earthmakers.

1. The speed of rotation of the Earth.

Scientific evidence says that the Earth rotates around its axis at a speed of a half-kilometer per second. It is difficult to even imagine such a quick object! In favor of the plane earths, there are several simple experiments, for example, with a jump. Everyone knows that, bouncing, the person lands at the same place. But how to deal with the rotation? After all, for those shares of the second, which he was in the jump, the planet had to move to a considerable distance, and the landing site would be another point. The same result gives a shot of a gun into the sky. In addition, if you shoot east (against the direction of rotation), the kernel should fly two times less than the norm, and if weest are twice as much. Nevertheless, this does not happen. Yes, and pilots flying over the Earth never registered, as she rotates, although to whom, as not to them, the change in the position of the planet should be seen from above.

2. Perfectly smooth horizon.

Look in the distance. Peer good, I do not miss sight of the slightest detail. What do you see? Referencely smooth area of \u200b\u200bthe horizon in the terrain where it is clearly visible - fields, meadows, marine smooth state - can not be deceived. After all, in a free area, the look covers several kilometers away, so why are they perfectly smooth? According to the Adepts theory, the answer is obvious - the land is flat! In addition, high objects (for example, towers, lighthouses, mountain peaks) would be simply not visible, because the spherical surface closed them from a careful eye, as the horizon line would be significantly higher. That's just this does not happen, and you can admire the mountains from a very long distance, which has one kilometer.

3. Flights.

Many flights, especially distant, at first glance seem illogical from the point of view of the sodographicness of the Earth. Looking at the globe, you can wonder why the pilots choose exactly the same, at first glance, an illogical path and uncomfortable dots for refueling. However, there is no riddle and irrationalism in this: if you compare these routes with a flat card, it becomes clear that the route is idle perfectly.

4. Star drawing.

If all objects in the universe are in constant motion, then why then the stars in the sky are absolutely the same as today, and a few centuries ago. After all, in theory, the star drawing should change if not every day, then once a week certainly. However, this does not happen. The thing is that the stars are just a hologram on the heavenly dome, which cannot be modified, move relative to each other and even more so fall. And the famous meteorite rain, which is looking forward to all the romance of the world to make a wish, is a holographic effect.

5. Yellow sun.

Scientific laws are quite extensive, why the sky is blue, and the sun is yellow. According to official data, ultraviolet, passing through the atmosphere, dispelled on the spectra, one of which paints the heavenly cloth. However, this does not explain why part of the rays, focused around the Sun, does not break down, because then it should be isa-blue. It is not that the sun is below the dome-heaven, which limits the space. Round around the earth, it alternately illuminates the territory, so the light clock regularly replace each other.

6. Space Flights - Mysterification.

None of the plane earths saw the space space with their own eyes, which means it is possible to dispute its existence to hoarseness. Photos - fake, video - solid special effects, and flights into space - fantastic stories. Convinced adherents of this theory even several times organized an expedition-investigation to find photographing sites "on the moon". And when the cosmonauts were asked to swear on the Holy Scripture, that they were on the moon, they all showed aggression and left the answer.

7. Free course of rivers.

According to the law of reporting vessels, a network of water bodies, enveloping the Earth, simply could not exist on a spherical planet as in which we see it today. However, rivers flow to the west, East, North and South almost equally, and their depth and fullness is not related to the geographical position. Such characteristics are possible only if the land is flat.

8. View of technicians.

One of the weighty arguments in favor of its theory of plane earth is used by the universal conspiracy of engineers, technicians and other personalities, one way or another related to work in conditions of extensive spaces. For example, geodesists do not take into account the curvature of the Earth in the design of buildings and structures. But in this case, the structure made on this project simply could not withstand the overall load and collapsed. However, this does not happen, and buildings are idle not one dozen years. The conclusion suggests only one: they are aware that the land is actually flat, but keep this mystery from the population. The same applies to pilots of airplanes, which, taking off from a spherical surface, no longer corrected the trajectory of the flight down to the landing. How? After all, under such conditions, the aircraft would fly into open space. And if you look at it from the point of view of a flat land, everything becomes in its place.

These evidence are the most common of those that use the society of flat land to refute the generally accepted theory. To judge their loyalty, you need to consider and the beliefs of the so-called "Charoverts" who adhere to a scientific point of view.

Why land - ball? Arguments Disprovers Flat Earth

The concept of which the scientific society adheres to will benefit the many justifications, some of which look rather convincing. What are the governors say in favor of their theory?

1. Moon and her eclipse.

Even if not to take into account photography, proving the existence of the moon as a satellite of our planet, the shadow, which the earth discarded, gradually reaching the lunar eclipse, directly testifies to its shag-likeness. An Aristotle, who spoke in support of the spherical nature of the planet, considered the discarded shadow as an oval, which directly contradicted the theories about the flat form of the Earth.

2. Change constellations.

This argument was also considered at the time of Aristotle. Traveling around the world, he fixed the position of the stars in the sky and the appearance of each of them. So, being at the Equator, he opened constellations that were not visible in other latitudes. And the farther from the Equator there was a scientist, the less familiar stars saw on the shift of others. This effect could be explained only by the fact that a person looks at the sky from a spherical surface, otherwise the location would not strongly affect the visibility of the stars.

3. Time Zones.

And although Polsky-earth arguments argue that the change of time of day comes due to the rotation of the sun, the chaservers are confident that it is the Earth to rotate around his axis. That is why different times have been established in different countries, and when, for example, in America a deep night, the sun shines in China, and the day is in full swing.

4. Force of gravity.

Another proof of a spherical planet is gravity - the strength of attraction between objects. According to the laws of physics, it acts on the center of mass. But after all, falling, the apple lands from top to bottom, and not at an angle to the center, and the person walking along the surface of the Earth, it feels attraction to the bottom, and not a lobby, closer to the center of the "disk". That is why it is possible to judge that the center of the Earth is under it, from which the maximum gravity is coming, and this means that the Earth has a spherical shape. However, the plane earth rejects this proof, because it is believed that gravity is just the result of the movement of the planet up with an acceleration of 9.8 m / s2.

5. The appearance of objects from height.

If you climb the mountain, a high tree or lighthouse, looking at the outlines of the horizon through binoculars, it can be noted that the distance of visibility increases in directly proportional to the height on which the person is located. Of course, visible obstacles can prevent the purity of the experiment, however, in the field or in the meadow, this effect is most noticeable. But if the land was flat, the height of the sighting site would not affect the visibility of objects on the horizon. This is possible only if the planet has a shape of the ball.

6. Ship on the horizon.

Files, the ship on perfectly flat marine gladies does not disappear. First of all, its body is lost, and only after that hiding behind the horizon and sails. The same is observed and when it approaches the shore: sometimes sails are visible, and only then the ship itself. This directly proves that, despite the seeming directness of the horizon, he is curved the spherical form of the Earth.

7. Sundial.

The effect of the solar clock is designed based on the shade, which the sun gives at different times. Sticking a stick to the ground, it is possible to pursue how the shadow from her gradually changes his outlines. And if the world was plane, the position of the stick would not affect the shape of the shadow, and at different points it would be identical. However, even insignificant at first glance, a distance of several tens of kilometers between two experimental sticks gives a different result, and the shadows of at least a few tenth millimeters differ in each other. This principle was applied before our era when calculating the circumference of the Earth, which was conducted by Eratosthenes.

8. Documentary facts.

And although the plane earth argue that photographs from satellites and space flights are a hoarfrost, the balls are firmly confident in their existence. Numerous pictures of our planet, obtained from outer space, flights to the moon and the study of other planets - the scientific treet, which has reached humanity over hundreds of years of experiments and developments. True, considerable funds are invested in these studies, and their effectiveness is confirmed by snapshots, but this is the other side of the medal.

Flat Earth in context of modern art

Whatever controversial the theory, denying the generally accepted form of our planet, she repeatedly popked in the writings of fiction, film directories and writers. It is enough to remember the well-known "Narnia Chronicles" Clive Lewis to understand that this idea attracts the general public. The cosmology of Narnia presents the idea of \u200b\u200bthe plane of the Earth, beyond the boundaries of which is the paradise - Aslan. Heroes come there, following the routes of an old card resembling medieval.

English fictory Terry Pratchuch dedicated the concept of a whole cycle of works with predictable name Flat world. In his opinion, based on the ancient Indian myths, the disc-shaped pland is supported by four elephants, and they are in the turn, stand on a centuries-old turtle. And who loved the multimillion crowd of the audience "Pirates of the Caribbean"? Captain Jack Sparrow Team, able to reach the end of the planet, where the bottomless waterfall was buried.

Not bypass this concept and domestic writers. Thus, the story of the "monk on the edge of the Earth" Sergei Synyaka describes the expedition to the heavenly dome, after which its participants were subjected to repression by the state. However, the results of the expedition were undeniable: flight into space is nothing more than fiction based on the distortion of the picture of the universe.

Afterword

What to believe, what concept to adhere to is the personal matter of everyone. One more convenient to believe that the Earth is a ball, while others also unshakably convinced that our planet is flat. Anyway, climb into space to clearly make sure of one of these movements, it is not possible for most people possible, so you have to use what we have - eyes, logic and common sense. It is enough to close the textbooks, open a satellite card and drive through it a significant distance, checking a kilometer and a trajectory with official data. Uncomplicated practical experiences will allow to understand where reality ends and a hoax begins.

It is best to finish this dispute that the words of the wisest Dalai Lama: "In any case, all this is very slightly, right? The basis of the exercise is; What they say about the device of life, about the nature of suffering, about the nature of the mind. These are the foundations of the exercise. This is what is most important; What is directly related to our life. Whether the world has a square or round, does not matter as long as the pros and peace reigns in it. "

Hello, friends! What if you learn that there is no space, the land is flat, there are several suns? NASA is funded by the Secret World Government, headed by Masons, to introduce all the lives living on the planet. Nobody was in space, the moon is artificial.

Is it not really shocking statements, at first glance, seemingly crazy nonsense? But do not rush to turn your finger at the temple.

There is a considerable, growing every day, the army of adherents, the theory of flat land for which is not nonsense or pseudo-contamination, but, on the contrary, it seems the sole truth.

Supporters of this theory are carried out, experiments, research, lead hundreds of weighty evidence that we live at all on a geoid balloon, spinning around our axis and carrying up with a speed of 30 km per second around the Sun, and on a flat "plate" covered with a transparent dome .

This topic is incredibly um. A thousand and one question immediately arises: how then the oceans are not poured, why we do not see the night of the sun, how are all these photos and video of space expeditions, planets, moon, spaces, shtters, lunas, satellites, astronauts? This is what will be discussed in the article.

Society of flat land

In school we were taught that only ancient people believed in such fairy tales. Recall where you can meet the mention of flat land? In Sumerian, Scandinavian, cosmogonic mythology, in the ancient residents of Egypt, Babylon, Greece, in biblical legends, Vedic literature, in Hinduism and Buddhism.

It was all in antiquity, in the Middle Ages also met followers of this theory. In our time, the generally accepted is the fact that the Earth has a shape of the ball, and rather, the form of a geoid, and all the ancient representations are noteworthy and recognized as modern science is absolutely insolvent.

However, this does not mean that everyone has safely abandoned the ancient treatises, forgot about the presences of ancestors and believed to school textbooks. There is a so-called "Flat Earth Society". It originated in England in the 19th century with the light hand of the English inventor Samuel Roubotam. He spent various experiments and experiments, during which he saw what he wanted to see the land is flat.

Under the pseudonym Pararallax, he wrote a small book, which is called "zettic astronomy", where the results of some of his experiments and evidence that the earth does not have the shape of the ball, and the surface of the world ocean is a flat plane.

For several years, the book was reprinted, each time the number of pages in it increased, as well as the number of followers of the roubotum theory. Pararallax himself conducted paid lectures, he kept himself aggressively, and even was able to attack those who dared to disagree with his point of view.

The followers appeared in America and Europe, the movement spread into consequences around the world. Hitler, by the way, was also the adept of this theory. The most interesting thing is that supporters of this idea are becoming more and more, society broke up into several different currents and organizations.

And it doesn't matter that many scientists have experienced the loyalty of the statement that the land is a ball-shaped, adherents of the "Flat theory" do not pay attention to this and lead their unshakable arguments. Enough to dial the appropriate request in the search engine and voila! A whole heap of video, facts, evidence, reasoning, refutations, forums, discussions on this topic.

But before proceeding to the description of the most common and similar to the truth of the arguments, let's look at the main postulates of adherents of the theory of flat land:

• Imagine a disk, in the center of which is located the North Pole, the diameter of the disk is a little more than forty thousand kilometers - this is our planet.
• The land is covered with a transparent dome, over which the sun rotates and, like point lamps, it provides a change of day and night, gravity, in its familiar representation, does not exist.
• There is no Antarctic, and instead of the southern pole, the edge of the Earth, it is sicked by an icy wall throughout the circumference.
• All photos from space are treated in photoshop or other programs, fakes. Space ships and other devices are made of cardboard and plywood, all travels to space are removed by fictional scenarios on Earth.
• The dominant point of view of the shag-formation of the Earth is only a plot sponsored by masons in order to hide the truth from the entire population of the planet.
• Anyone who knows the truth: scientists, NASA staff, astronauts are funded by masons and are also members of the conspiracy.

Is there a solar system

Let's start with the idea of \u200b\u200bthe solar system, whether it looks like they led to school: in the center of the sun, around which planet rotates, the land ranks third. Can this be true? According to the Adepts of the Society of Flat Earth - of course not.

Why? Everything is logical: such a model of the solar system could exist if the sun would be motionlessly hung in space, but it is not so, because everything is moving in space. If everything was so, then the sun according to the logic of things should fly at a huge speed, and the planets fly behind it and spiral spirals, but cannot be.

The second fact: the strength of attraction and repulsion of the planets and the sun. The attraction force allows the planets not to "fly away" from the Sun, and the power of repulsion allows not to face each other and hold on at a certain distance from the sun.

But the masses of the planets are different. And if the solar system would exist in the model, which is described in the books, then the planets with a larger mass must be closer to the sun, and with a smaller mass further, since the strength of attraction for small planets is required significantly less than for large.

Little planets simply would not have enough repulsion strength, they are at such a relatively short distance. So, our planet would be located in the sixth place (according to their mass) in a number of other planets and on Earth would be unrealistic cold.

Evidence and facts

We will not torment you and turn to the most interesting: evidence and facts that adherents are adherents that the earth is a flat disk, and not a spinner.

Atmospheric pressure does not exist?

Let's figure it out. The atmospheric pressure is openly experienced by the physicist of the gosnzhelist Torrichell, who invented the mercury barometer. He conducted experience with mercury and water, refuting, thus, the assertion of Aristotle, that there is no emptiness in nature, that is, there is no vacuum.

Torricelli proved that the vacuum exists, as well as there is an atmospheric pressure that presses on any bodies. But with water such a trick does not roll. Why did he come with mercury, he can also work out with alcohol.

In fact, water barometers also exist, but they are very big, because the water is required at times more than alcohol or mercury so that it began to evaporate. You can read books or online books in more detail about this experience. Yes, the question arises here, where Torricelli had a whole bucket of mercury, which is thirteen times heavier than water, and also radioactive? But that is another story.

So, here, as the supporters of the theory of flat land show, in the case of Torricelli's experience, no vacuum was formed in the test tube, and the apparent emptiness was really simply a couple of mercury, which, with a minimum pressure in the top of the inverted test tube, began to boil at room Temperature. That is, it turns out that the atmospheric pressure does not exist? And there is no gravity forces in the usual representation either.

The space above the ground is not moving anywhere, it becomes clear, the adherents of the theory of flat land are offered to look at birds that are freely flying, the clouds that move depending on the direction of the wind.

A helicopter or a balloon can hang out motionless in the air and their pilots, according to the logic of things (well, if the ground is spherical and spinning) should see a moving land, but this does not happen.

Then, even a stone, descended up, and flying a few seconds, then falling a few seconds, must land for many meters from the throw place if the earth is spinning, but this does not happen. Why? Because the earth is flat, the adherents of the anti-scientific theory are responsible.

The curvature of the Earth beyond the horizon

These experiments began to conduct another Roubotham, they became more in our time, and they were diversified. If the Earth is a ball, that is, curvature, and the horizon line should not be visible. But in practice, such high objects like lighthouses, mountains, statues are visible from such distances with which they must be significantly lower than the horizon line, and, therefore, should not be visible if the ground is spherical.

For example, the Nidls Lighthouse, located near the County Hampshire in the UK, whose height is 54 meters, is visible at a distance of 60 kilometers, and the curvature of the Earth at this distance is 282 meters. It turns out that the point where the lighthouse is located must be lower than the horizon line by 282 meters, if the ground is spherical. But this does not happen - the lighthouse is visible from such a distance.

The same situation with ships that are in the open sea, and we look at them from the shore. The illusion is created that removing from the coast, the ship is hidden behind the horizon, which seems to confirm the fact that the spherical land has bend.

However, if you take good equipment and set up a magnifying zoom, the ship "disappeared behind the horizon" will reappear in the field of our vision. That is, our vision is limited to the scattering point of the perspective, not the horizon line. If "arm eye", then no horizon line, limiting visibility due to the curvature of the Earth, will not.

All photos from space - cheating, sky is the dome, stars and the sun, and indeed the whole world is artificial. The portholes in airplanes create the illusion of the Rounding of the Earth, but this is an optical deception. Look at the coat of arms of the UN, Is this a flat land model?

Flights to the moon: True or a grand deception

Supporters of the Flat Land Theory claim that the Americans were never on the moon, the Apollo-11 can be considered for example, on which the residents of the Earth, allegedly made the first journey to the moon.

If you increase the photo, then you can see from which the "lunohod" is made: the oilbox, cardboard, foil, plastic, and other things, not intended to overcome the atmospheric pressure, and even more so traveling to space, material.

Click to enlarge

It is just a layout, photographed against the background of astronauts, which, without exception, are masons. In some photos, you can even see that on the fingers of astronauts or on their wrists there are rings or hours with a generally accepted Masonic symbolism: a circular and a square, inside of which the letter G.

Where are the photos "from Mars"

The same situation with photographs that are made, allegedly, on Mars. The Adepts of the "Flat theory" argue that pictures from Mars are in fact only processed photographs of the earth's surface, taken in certain places.

Have you seen pictures with a red planet - a stony lifeless place? The fact is that if you skip them through the photoshop filter, it will be seen that in these pictures quite a terrestrial surface, over which the blue sky spread. Such landscapes can be found in many regions of our planet.

Routes of flights

Using the theory of flat land is easy to explain some, seeming illogical, air travel. For example, from Sydney () in Santiago (Latin America) it is convenient to fly directly with refueling, for example in New Zealand. But in fact, the route passes through North America.

If you look at the round globe, it turns out that the plane in this case makes a strange angle. And if you transfer the same route to a flat land map, it can be seen that it is a direct adequate path.

This can be checked almost on any routes by applying which to the flat land map, it becomes clear that such a path of flights is very logical and adequate, which you can not say about them in applied to a spherical model.

Moon, Sun, Stars

The picture will be incomplete without understanding what is really (or not in fact, but on the representation of the Adepts theory of the Flat Earth) Moon, the Sun and Stars. Here again we see the approval that all photos "on the moon" are filmed on Earth.

Even special expeditions are conducted by the society of flat land, the purpose of which is to search for places on our planet, where they are removed, alleged space photos. During such an expedition to Iceland in August 2015, they filmed landscapes, exactly, repeating those pictures and videos, which we are told what they were made on the moon.

Astronauts participating in the program "Apollo" (Recall that this was the first piloted landing on the moon, which ended in 1975), all before one refused to swear on the Bible, that they were really on the moon. Fragments of this video is easy to find on the Internet. Someone from astronauts swears, someone leaves the answer, someone roughly sends a journalist who asks to swear on the Bible about the reality of walking along the lunar surface.

We present you a video in which it is proved that the flights to the moon are a fiction:

If you collect all the arguments, add data to them obtained as a result of the observations conducted by some alternative researchers, season the information received by knowledge of flat land and systematize the material, it turns out that the moon is no land satellite, it does not exist in principle. How do we see it? This is a huge hologram hanging on top and periodically updated.

Now let's turn to the stars. It is known that astrology is ancient science and many constellations, for example, a big bear was discovered thousands of years ago. And during this time, the constellations did not change. Is it not strange if all the bodies in space are constantly moving at a huge difference rate?

In addition, if the Earth is spinning all the time around its axis, and even around the sun, then why do you see the same stars over the heads of the same stars over the heads? After all, the Earth turns to them with different sides, besides the same flies around the sun, and the stars are "standing" as the inscuffed, in the same place. Doesn't it seem absurd? We do not know how you, but supporters of the theory of flat land - it seems. They argue that stars are also holograms.

Now we'll figure it out with the sun. Did the sun - also hologram? There are many pictures, articles and video, which indicates not one, and many suns, and they "hang" in different parts over our land and shine differently. There are even listed with brief descriptions of all seventeen suns: since California and finishing Chinese. Of course, scientists will say that this is all nonsense. But let's see what they explain the adepts believers in a flat land.

The fact is that this color, in which we see it (from yellow to red) in the sun can not be. After all, according to official theory, the blue sky is due to the fact that the light of the sun, passing through the atmosphere, is divided into spectra and one of the spectra (blue-blue) paints the sky in this color. Why then the sun itself seems yellow?

Since we see it through the atmosphere, it should also be painted in a blue color as the sky. Does this mean that we see the sun not through the atmosphere? The sun is not over the atmosphere, and is significantly lower and it is not real? What happens in the end?

The earth has a disc shape and is under a dome from which artificial hologram lighting lights shine: the moon, the sun, the stars. If it is interesting to deepen in this topic, then books, rollers, materials distributed by adherents of the theory of flat land is easy to find.

Closer to the light source - warmer

All love to bring book proofs based on theory. But no one can answer the easiest question without books.

When we approach the source of heat, then it becomes hotter. Why at the height of the flight of the aircraft is colder than on Earth? No, do not write about the temperatures of a certain atmosphere layer, you still take it again from books and did not check themselves.

Let's in fact - closer to the heat source - warmer. Those. Closer to the Sun must be warmer. But this is not upon fact. This suggests that the heat source is false. In space should be much hotter than on Earth under the right rays of the sun.

False World Map (Supplement)

We complement this article by the new information that we have submitted to a separate review because of your volume.

- The article clearly considered the size of the continents, which show the official source - Yandex.Maps and which strongly contradict the world map, which we know from childhood.

Finally, I would like to note That all information for the article has been prepared and collected from free sources, the purpose of the article is not the declination of readers to a particular point of view. All material is only informational in nature and we wonder what you think about the theory of flat land. What proof seems to be the most weighty, and what is the finger supened?

Leading Numerologist of Russia Julie according to the dome and flat land

Unfusing Flat Earth Proof - Video Film:

Scientists have proven that the land is not round - video facts

Voting - what land?

Article in video format

Share the article with friends, discuss, subscribe to our updates, and we tell you: "Before the meeting" and go to search for new secrets of the Universe.

We will be glad to your opinion on the topic of flat land in the comments.

Before disembarking astronauts on the moon, it existed that the first people on the satellite should be left there is not the American flag, but a flag representing all of humanity. Very by the way, a healthy idea. However, these few voices were not heard. But in 1970, they pushed living on the farm in Illinois James Cadle to the creation of the flag of the Earth.

According to Cadla's plan, the flag should be used to represent humanity as a whole, without dividing to countries, organization or individuals. James Cadl dedicated his life to the popularization of the flag and sent it to everyone (in exchange for compensation for the cost of manufacturing and delivery of the flag). Before his death, he translated the flag of the Earth to the public domain, so now you can use it freely and, for example, to post outside the window on public holidays.

Oh yeah, the flag of the earth looks like this:

There is some kind of symbolism here, isn't it?

So-so! I didn't even mean that. Stop:

I meant the sun, the earth and the moon.

In general, James William Van Kirk, a priest from Youngstown (Ohio, USA), one of the first to designed his world flag design in 1913 and with this flag spent twice the marches of the world through Europe.

Here is his image:

Another option was offered Ann Kirstine Ronhead in about 2000. The flag that was a blue cloth in the center of which is located a blue circle with its white ring, symbolizing the earth, was to symbolize the idea of \u200b\u200bpeace and coexistence. The simplicity of the flag design chased the goal of the convenience of its manufacture for everyone.

That's how it looks like:

In 2006, Paul Carroll proposed the option of the flag called "World Flag" to them, symbolizing the globalization of the modern world. The flag of P. Carolla is a rectangular canvas, in the center of which is located a world map, surrounded by flags of 216 countries and territories, as well as the UN flag.

Not very like that, honestly:

In 2015, the Swedish artist Oscar Pernefeld proposed the design of the international flag of the planet Earth. According to Pernefeld's plan, this flag should be used in future space expeditions (in particular, by piloted flight to Mars) and is designed to perform two main purposes: Presentation of the planet Earth in space and as a reminder to people of land, that we all divide this planet, regardless of national borders, and should take care of each other and the planet on which we live.

The flag is an image of seven rings crossing each other, on a dark blue background. Images of intersecting rings are formed in the middle of a flower, symbolizing life on Earth, and the crossing of the rings symbolizes that everything on Earth is directly or indirectly connected. Dark blue background symbolizes the ocean and the importance of water for life on Earth.

The United Nations Flag, approved on December 7, 1946, is an image of the official emblem of the United Nations, located in the center of the Blue Color - UN color. This emblem of white is depicted on both sides of the panel. The UN flag was used to demonstrate the unity of the world community, although technically represents only the UN itself. The wide fame of the image of this flag makes it quite representative to express the interests of the planet as a whole.

By the way, I could never understand why on the flag of the UN Earth is in the sighting grid of some weapon? In the light of some events, the feeling of not protecting countries is created, but such that they are under the sight of the UN.

And so the flag of the earth dreams of seeing a modern young generation from the Internet: